Does Anyone Have Too Much Money to Use an Annuity?

It’s a great question that I got a few weeks ago during a meeting and it stumped me for just a second.  Dianne and Fred have saved more than enough for retirement and their income needs are modest in comparison to the total portfolio value.  They are also young, both under the age of 60, so traditional products don’t have the same value as they would for a couple age 65 or older.

I took the common approach and first showed them what a traditional income product would cost and the benefit of doing it that way.  Some people like the idea of consistency and guaranteed income annuities are convenient and worry-free.  But the cost is prohibitively expensive in many cases so alternative strategies need to be explored as well.

For Dianne and Fred, retirement spending needs amount to roughly 3% of their total portfolio value.  At that level a traditional income annuity would be affordable but given their young age I don’t feel it’s the best option for them.  So I took them through several other strategies for producing retirement income that included use of bonds, growth and dividend stocks.  Each has benefits and disadvantages so we spent a lot of time talking about the potential for every scenario.

One option I showed had them staying 100% invested in the stock market.  For anyone with higher spending needs this will show potential disaster in times with serious market volatility.  But Dianne and Fred saw that their portfolio would have survived some of the most volatile periods in past market cycles.  This is when Fred asked if there was ever a time when someone has too much money to use an annuity.

My answer is simple.  Yes, there are plenty of times when a traditional income annuity is not necessary.  But there are always other reasons to use annuities.  In situations like this when someone has more than enough for a comfortable retirement it’s more about risk tolerance than anything else.  Lots of people have enough assets to weather any market downturn but seeing a portfolio cut in half might not be all too settling, even if a long-term simulation shows portfolio recovery.

Dianne and Fred are investigating the use of annuities in retirement because they want to reduce volatility.  That’s exactly what a deferred annuity can do.  Bonds are the traditional choice for people that don’t buy annuities but an annuity has a decided advantage when consistent withdrawals are part of a retirement plan. 

Annuities are meant for reducing risk in retirement.  Insulating a portfolio from market losses allows you to maintain more of your principal balance and increases long-term growth potential.  When the market drops it takes less time to recover if your whole portfolio didn’t take a hit.  That means you get to move forward and start growing sooner.

Lots of people who have more than enough money and still use annuities.  I would honestly say that many of my clients don’t even need annuities but choose to use them for one strategic advantage or another.  Guaranteed income products are fine but there is usually a better way.  If you have saved enough for retirement and don’t like the idea of a lifetime commitment or fees that erode your investments then you may want to look at an alternative use for annuities no matter how much money you have.

If asset protection, liquidity and growth are of concern to you then a simple alternative may provide what you want. Feel free to call, email or get on my calendar below.

Bryan

800.438.5121

Make an appointment now

4 replies
  1. William Brown
    William Brown says:

    It’s so strange, when I bought the annuities,I bought for the guaranteed income and the guaranteed growth. My life style is frugal and I still live a amazing life style just on s and pension. I want to leave something behind and the annuity death benefit guarantees that. I don’t like the cost but am torn between the tummy comfort verses the stock market rollercoaster ride. What are your thoughts?

    Reply
    • Bryan Anderson
      Bryan Anderson says:

      It all depends on the cost of the guarantee in relation to the value it provides. If you pay a steep fee for guaranteed growth then you need to compare it to a guaranteed product without a fee to see if the death benefit really returns more. Several products guarantee a death benefit and you picked one that charges a fee. That doesn’t make it a bad contract but there could be a better option.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *